An A/B test answers with an experiment instead of an opinion. Version A (control) and version B (variant) are shown to randomly split traffic at the same time, and a metric like click-through or conversion rate is compared. "At the same time" is the crucial part — run A for a month and then B for a month and seasonality or trend gets tangled in with whatever the variant actually changed.
A slightly higher number doesn't automatically mean a winner. With a small sample, random noise easily looks like a real effect, so a result only counts once it clears statistical significance — the odds this gap happened by chance are low enough to trust.
Where usability testing is qualitative and tells you why people struggle, A/B testing is quantitative and tells you which version performs better. Teams typically narrow candidates with usability testing first, then confirm the winner against real traffic with an A/B test.
The counter below is example data to illustrate the concept — not a real experiment result.
When to use
Use it for a final call once you're down to two candidates and have enough traffic. With low traffic it takes a long time to reach significance, so consider a qualitative method first.